top of page

Blog

Blog Picture.jpg
Search

One challenge I faced when I was working on my book Jalan Singapura was covering Singapore’s recent transport history - the period from 2011 to the time of writing, which was 2019 (final edits to the manuscript were made in April). The local transport scene was evolving at lightning speed. Facts and statistics had to be updated every few weeks.


Good examples were electric scooters (e-scooters) and electric bicycles (e-bikes). As I was finalising my manuscript, the former had taken over the island’s pavements and walkways. Its low prices, ease of riding, and lack of regulatory framework to oversee its use, saw population numbers surging to at least 40,000. I made sure to draw parallels between its careless introduction and that of other modes of transport throughout Singapore’s modern history.

ree
Credit: TODAY.

Within a few months after publication, the e-scooter population had further grown to 100,000. Then, on 5 November that year, after a spate of accidents, mostly between e-scooters and pedestrians, the Transport Ministry abruptly banned e-scooters and other personal mobility devices (PMDs) from footpaths.


In a flash, the Era of E-scooters had ended as soon as it had begun.


Fast forward 19 months, and the Republic’s registered e-scooter population had plunged to just 6,671 as of end-May 2021 - a precipitous decline of 93 per cent.


PMDs are still allowed on cycling paths and park connector networks, but the infrastructure is still too inadequate to encourage widespread use.


Instead, many have switched to bicycles - or e-bikes. Boosting their numbers is increased demand from food delivery riders, as food delivery services have grown in popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic.

ree
Credit: The New Paper.

E-bikes had to be registered from 2018. At the time, there were around 13,000 of them; last May, there were 15,800; this had doubled to 31,660 by the end of this May.


Just as growth in the e-scooter fleet in previous years had led to a rise in e-scooter accidents, the same is happening to the e-bike fleet.


In 2019, there were 24 accidents and no fatalities involving the two-wheelers; the following year, there were 75 accidents and three deaths. Still nothing compared to motor vehicular casualties, but worth keeping an eye on.


From 30 June, it became mandatory for e-scooter and e-bike riders to pass an online theory test on rules and safe riding practices.


This requirement is too lax though. At least a practical test is needed. Even then, just as many motorists throw out what they’ve learned in driving school the moment they get their licence, the same will happen to e-scooter and e-bike riders too.


Ultimately, like motorists, e-scooters and e-bikes need more infrastructure in the form of Channels of Movement - preferably dedicated paths - coupled with a stricter regulatory framework with strong enforcement to ensure law-breakers suffer deterrent punishments. This was an argument I had put forth in Jalan Singapura, and two years on, it hasn’t changed.


When a new mode of transport is introduced, the infrastructure to give it the space it needs, and the regulatory framework to keep its users on the straight and narrow, must be in place first. Otherwise - to use a transport analogy - it’s putting the cart before the horse.


In the transport scene, fortunes can rise and fall in a flash, but some principles are timeless.

 

24 May 2021 will go down as an ignominious date in the annals of Malaysian rail history - two Light Rail Transit (LRT) trains collided that evening in an underground tunnel along the nation’s busiest train line, Kuala Lumpur’s Kelana Jaya LRT Line. It was the system’s first accident in its 23-year history.


The 37-station LRT line is the Klang Valley’s first fully automated and driverless rail system - but human error contributed to the accident.


It started with an empty train on a test run timing out as it headed towards a depot, its automatic system failing.


Its driver manually drove the faulty train in the wrong direction, against the flow of traffic, causing a head-on collision with a driverless train ferrying 213 passengers between KLCC and Kampung Baru stations.


In all, 166 sustained light injuries, while 47 had serious injuries. Videos and photos of the accident and injured passengers circulated on social media.

ree
Credit: AFP.
ree
Credit: The Reader's Journal.
ree
One of the damaged trains. Credit: Malay Mail.

Consequently, chairman of state-owned LRT operator Prasarana Malaysia, Datuk Seri Tajuddin Abdul Rahman, was sacked.


Condolences to the casualties of the disaster.


A train accident is one of the worst things that can happen to a train operator or line. An accident is one accident too many. In an instant, all previous goodwill built up - even over decades - will be wiped out.


In this day and age, with advanced technology, the emphasis on safety, and the dependence of so many on rail for essential transport, serious accidents such as head-on collisions with packed trains just isn’t acceptable at all.


As for Singapore’s Mass Rapid Transit system, it has had just two train collisions. The first one took place on 5 August 1993 between Buona Vista and Clementi stations (that was before Dover station was built between them), causing 156 injuries. The second one occurred on 15 November 2017 at Joo Koon station, causing 38 injuries. But as mentioned earlier, a collision is one collision too many.

ree
The 15 November 2017 train collision at Joo Koon station. Credit: New Straits Times.


 
  • May 24, 2021

S. Iswaran took office as Singapore’s sixth Transport Minister on 15 May.


Last Friday, on 21 May, a signalling fault occurred on the Circle MRT Line, between Lorong Chuan and Caldecott stations. The alert was sounded at 5.26am, and it took operator SMRT almost two hours to fix the issue. Commuters between Lorong Chuan and Farrer Road stations had to endure at least 30 minutes’ additional travelling time during the morning peak period.

ree
The crowd at Serangoon MRT Interchange. Credit: The Straits Times.
ree
Alerts sent to the SG MRT Updates Telegram account.

It took only six days for S. Iswaran to experience his first train breakdown!


After his immediate predecessor Ong Ye Kung took over the portfolio on 27 July last year, it took all of 15 days for a train breakdown to occur. On 11 August, a train fault happened on the East West Line between Chinese Garden and Jurong East stations, adding 25 minutes of travelling time during the evening peak period. This was swiftly followed three days later by another train fault on the North South Line, between Jurong East and Bukit Batok stations, extending travelling time by 15 minutes.

ree
Alerts sent to the SG MRT Updates Telegram account on 11 August 2020.

Before Ong, there was Khaw Boon Wan. He became Transport Minister on 1 October 2015. Twenty-five days later, on 26 October, a power failure on the North East Line led to a delay in the launch of trains for the morning service. Instead of service beginning at 5.37am, the southbound service started at 6.51am, while the northbound service rolled out at 7.20am. In all, 41,000 commuters were affected.

ree
Credit: Today.

It’s getting customary for new Transport Ministers to quickly experience what it’s like to get a train breakdown on their watch. And the experience is coming sooner - from 25 days, to 15 days, to six days.


S. Iswaran’s successor, beware!

 

Copyright © 2025 Eisen Teo. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page